Socrates 1776 Sign in

Socrates 1776

Critical thinking through the Trivium, guided by wisdom literature.

A teacher's tool for examining what students read: textbooks, lessons, articles and the news. Paste a passage or a headline, and Socrates 1776 walks your students through what it claims, whether the reasoning holds, and how its words try to move them.

Sign in or create an account

What it does

Every text is examined in the classical order: first the Trivium, then Wisdom.

Grammar

What exactly is being claimed? Key terms, ambiguous words, and whether the text states a fact, an opinion, a prediction or a moral claim.

Logic

Does the claim hold up? Common fallacies, hidden assumptions, and what the text leaves out.

Rhetoric

How is it written? Loaded words, emotional framing, and a Veritas grade from A to F for how fairly the text presents its claim.

Wisdom

When the text makes a moral claim or shows someone's choices, the virtue at stake is weighed against Scripture.

Socrates 1776 examines the words on the page. It does not guess at a writer's motives or anyone's heart.

Works on paper. No student screens required.

Socrates 1776 is built for the teacher. Print a student worksheet and a teacher's copy with the full analysis, and discuss the Socratic questions out loud. Where screens are welcome, Student Mode sends the worksheet to a tablet or laptop by link, QR code or email. Students never need an account.

How it works

From text to classroom discussion in a few minutes.

  1. Paste a passage from a textbook, lesson or article, or a news headline.
  2. Choose a grade level: Primary (K-5), Middle (6-8), Secondary (9-12), or Advanced / Adult. The words and depth adjust to fit.
  3. Read the analysis tab by tab. Every part can be edited, so the final word is always the teacher's.
  4. Teach with it: print the worksheet, share it through Student Mode, or use the Socratic questions to lead a discussion. Every analysis is saved to your History.

A sample

What a teacher sees for one headline at the high school level, shortened.

Text under analysis"Senator slams rival in furious late-night post"
Grammar

A statement of fact: the senator posted criticism of a rival. "Slams" is ambiguous: sharply criticized, mocked, or insulted? The rival is not named.

Logic

No fallacy. The headline reports an event and makes no argument.

Rhetoric

B"Slams" and "furious" are the headline writer's dramatic words. They color a plain report without quoting what was actually said.

Wisdom

No virtue is clearly at stake: the headline summarizes a post without showing its words, so readers cannot judge the senator's character from it.

Socratic questions

Does "slams" mean (A) sharply criticized, (B) mocked, or (C) insulted? Why might a headline describe a post instead of quoting it? How could you find out what the senator actually wrote?

Wisdom literature and the founders

When a text invites it, Socrates 1776 draws on sources that have shaped Western thought and the American founding, always labeled as a thought for the reader.

Made for

Teachers

Check the curriculum you teach, or build a lesson from today's news, with an answer key and discussion questions.

Homeschool families

Teach logic and discernment at the kitchen table, at any grade level.

Classical educators

The Trivium applied to the words students meet every day.

Start with what your students read

Your information stays private. There are no ads and no tracking. Read our privacy policy.

Sign in or create an account